Manned Moon landings...Fact or Fiction?

To help this discussion I am including several URLs that lead you to relevent information( that are not Facebook related )

It is up to you an an individual to decide for yourself, once you have reviewed the 'evidence', if the manned moon- landing actually happened ...or is it all a huge hoax and con

As one Astronomer has said

if/when someone builds a telescope powerful enough to see the surface of the moon and the apparent exidence ( or lack of) that the Landing left , we can know for sure it it is a yes or a no that this actually happened .....


My original view was that,yes, it did happen

then years later I caught wind of the 'alternative theory' that we were the recipients of an elaborate hoax

I then sought for evidence to see either way...looked at it and redefined my onw beliefs on this issue..


Have a look and see what you think...these links are a brief selection from what is available for you to find so do not confine your search to what I have given here ..................



http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html

http://stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_landings/moon_landings.htm


http://www.facts-about.org.uk/science-moon-landing-conspiracy-hoax-theory.htm


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1tqZyZVoDM


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mouUUWpEec0



http://www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm

http://www.moonmovie.com/

Read over the evidence , view the videos, weigh up the pros and cons then see if your original belief ( ifthat was your original beleif) that we did actually land a man on the moon and walk on the surface of the Moon still 'holds water' ........

I have seen on Dicovery Channel a documentary about this... they pointed out a few details that prooved it was fake, for example, that the USA flag was waving.

In case this was fake, why would the governement have faked it? Why do they earn from this?

The Listener wrote:I have seen on Dicovery Channel a documentary about this... they pointed out a few details that prooved it was fake, for example, that the USA flag was waving.

In case this was fake, why would the governement have faked it? Why do they earn from this?

It is of 'interest' that no other nation has attempted to get a man on the Moon..
one might ask why


several problems arise

to get through http://www.crystalinks.com/vanallenbelt.html


how much protection would the astraunalts need to get through it safely

they have to get back

what about radiation sickness

also suggested the fuel capacity do to the entire thing

coudl they actually carry all that fuel?

There are lots of details that point out this whole landing was fake. But once again I wonder... why would the government do this?

I have seen on Dicovery Channel a documentary about this... they pointed out a few details that prooved it was fake, for example, that the USA flag was waving.

When astronauts were planting the flagpole they rotated it back and forth to better penetrate the lunar soil (anyone who's set a blunt tent-post will know how this works). So of course the flag waved! Unfurling a piece of rolled-up cloth with stored angular momentum will naturally result in waves and ripples -- no breeze required!

And they did not need a lot of fuel as the earth rotates it drags debris such as asteroids and other stuff to it which then gets destroyed in the atmosphere, so the rocket just had to get into the channel and it would be pulled back into earth.

@Lorcan

If the Lunar Module (LM) did land on the moon, where is the crater on the moon surface (under the LM) from the engines' thrust that would be created from the landing ?

There is none...

Ruby wrote:@Lorcan

If the Lunar Module (LM) did land on the moon, where is the crater on the moon surface (under the LM) from the engines' thrust that would be created from the landing ?

There is none...

I am sure the crater would be extremely hard to spot by now. There could very well have been lets say a meteor, or asteroid that hit the very same crater that was produced by the lunar module, therefore making it bigger, or deforming it in a way. That is not very sustainable evidence. As for the landing's being a hoax, I am sure that the several million people who still talk about it to this day, saw what actually happened.

xSiik wrote: As for the landing's being a hoax, I am sure that the several million people who still talk about it to this day, saw what actually happened.

yes

However, also consider the fact that all we got to see was the news feed from whereever they chose to send it. no independent produced showing any images of the landing

We took NASA s word for it

now we dare to question it

What reason would they have to fake them? Honetly, why would they? What would they have to gain?

The_Doctor wrote:What reason would they have to fake them? Honetly, why would they? What would they have to gain?

credibility

First to the moon

it is a huge lie

when you look at the evidence you can see it for what it is